The Nth Layer — AI Maturity Index

AI maturity benchmarking purpose-built for private equity

Most AI maturity frameworks are built for generic enterprises. This one is built for private equity — hold-period economics, portco context, and value creation tied to EBITDA.

Six pillar scores, a weighted overall score, a maturity stage, and peer comparisons from 54 sponsor-owned B2B SaaS companies. Plus a 90-day action plan to close the gaps.

01

Six pillar scores

A weighted overall score, a maturity stage, and a radar profile across Strategy & Leadership, Data & Knowledge Foundation, Use Cases & Value Capture, Talent & Operating Model, Governance & Risk, and Infrastructure & Tooling.

02

Named peer comparisons

Every result is benchmarked against a reference library of 54 sponsor-owned B2B SaaS companies. Every score is supported by public evidence with a clickable source link. The library is unique to Nth Layer.

03

A 90 day roadmap

A prioritised action list and a 90-day execution roadmap with EBITDA uplift modelling — tied to specific value creation levers, not generic AI best practice.

Six pillars. Weighted to reflect where EBITDA is created.

The Index synthesises the leading public AI maturity frameworks — Gartner, McKinsey, MIT, BCG, Cisco, Accenture, Deloitte, KPMG — and recalibrates for sponsor-backed value creation.

Strategy & Leadership
20%
Data & Knowledge Foundation
15%
Use Cases, Product & Value Capture Highest weight — most directly tied to EBIT contribution
25%
Talent, Operating Model & Workflow
20%
Governance, Risk & Trust
10%
Infrastructure & Tooling
10%

01

Sponsor-controlled

Majority PE ownership at time of scoring. The reference library is built for the hold-period context — not public-company benchmarks.

02

$100M+ ARR

Companies at scale, with enough operational surface area for AI to have meaningful impact on EBITDA, workflows, and product.

03

Public evidence only

Scoring relies entirely on public evidence — sponsor disclosures, audited filings, earnings calls, named case studies, and corroborating trade press. No insider information. Every score has a deep-linked source.

The 0 to 5 scale runs from Absent to Transformational. Three rules preserve scoring integrity.

Cumulative-stage rule A company cannot score Level N without evidence for Level N minus 1.
Conservative-bias rule Defaults to the lower score when judgement is required.
N/A rule Prefers an absent score to a guessed one.
LEVEL 0
Absent
No evidence of AI activity in this pillar.
LEVEL 1
Aware
Strategy or investment announced. No production output.
LEVEL 2
Operational
AI in production in at least one core workflow with measurable ROI.
LEVEL 3
Systemic
AI across most priority workflows. >2% EBIT impact. Governed agents.
LEVEL 4
Transformational
AI is the operating model. >5% EBIT directly attributable.

Every score is supported by evidence categorised on a four-tier hierarchy. A sponsor partner, LP, or acquirer can interrogate any cell, click through to the underlying source, and form an independent view.

Tier 1
audited_financial_disclosures
Annual reports, earnings releases, IPO filings. CFO-attested. The strongest form of evidence.
Tier 2
named_customer_references
Sponsor case studies and named references with quantified outcomes. Strong, but not formally audited.
Tier 3
corroborating_trade_press
Independent confirmation of Tier 1 or 2 facts. Useful in support, insufficient in isolation.
Tier 4 — Not credited
generic_marketing_claims
'AI-powered' positioning without quantified outcomes. We do not credit Tier 4 as evidence.